Procedural Agreement in Collective Bargaining

For more information on collective bargaining, check out this Florida State Law Review article, this Nova Southeastern University Law Review article, and this Boston College Law Review article. The NLRA establishes procedures for the selection of a workers` organization that represents a unit of workers in collective bargaining. Employers are prohibited by law from interfering in this selection. The NLRA requires the employer to negotiate with the designated representative of its employees. It does not require either party to accept a proposal or make concessions, but establishes procedural guidelines for good faith negotiations. Proposals that violate the NLRA or other laws should not be subject to collective bargaining. The NLRA also establishes rules on tactics (p.B strikes, lockouts, pickets) that each party can use to achieve its bargaining objectives. State laws continue to regulate collective bargaining and make collective agreements enforceable under state law. They can also provide guidelines for employers and employees who are not covered by the NLRA, for example. B agricultural workers. In Epic Systems Corp.

v. Lewis, 584 U.S. __ (2018), the Supreme Court upheld arbitration agreements that prohibited workers from pursuing labor-related claims on a collective or collective basis. The court ruled that this is clear under the Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C §§ 2, 3, 4), which ”requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements, including arbitration terms chosen by the parties.” This manual can be useful for answering questions that are not explicitly addressed in union agreements. Questions relating to union affairs and the interpretation of union agreements or contractual languages should be directed to the Industrial Relations Office, the appropriate staff officer on campus or the Lincoln Laboratory personnel office. The result of collective bargaining is a collective agreement. Collective bargaining is governed by federal and state laws, bylaws, and court decisions. Although each agreement describes the main terms negotiated between the institute and the union, it does not cover all situations. From time to time, special circumstances arise that require an interpretation of the wording of the contract.

Such an interpretation may give rise to controversy, which in turn may lead to the need for a solution through the complaint procedure of the agreement. However, a mutually acceptable interpretation is generally agreed between the Institute and the representatives of the union. When such interpretations are reached that could affect the relationship between supervisors and employees, supervisors are notified. The Institute has recognized the unions referred to in section 8.1 as exclusive bargaining parties for employees within their respective collective bargaining units and has entered into written collective agreements with each of them. The Institute has thus accepted the principle of collective determination of wages, hours of work and conditions of service, which must be applied in accordance with the principles of bilateral contractual agreements to which the Institute has acceded. The Institute enters into these agreements in good faith, and its policy and intent is to respect the letter and spirit of the agreements. Each supervisor/manager should familiarize themselves with the provisions of the agreements for employees in their area of responsibility. The Court also clarified that freedom of association means that a person has the right to develop his or her own beliefs rather than having them coerced by the state.

Therefore, unions are prohibited from using non-members` money to promote an ideological cause that has nothing to do with the union`s duties as a representative of collective bargaining. Collective bargaining refers to the process of bargaining between an employer and a union of employees to reach an agreement that regulates employees` working conditions. The most important legislation for collective bargaining is the National Labour Relations Act (NLRA). It is also known as Wagner`s law. It explicitly grants workers the right to bargain collectively and to join trade unions. The NLRA was originally enacted by Congress in 1935 as part of its power to regulate interstate commerce under the trade clause of Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It applies to most private non-agricultural workers and employers involved in any aspect of interstate trade. The decisions and regulations of the National Labour Relations Board (NLRB), established by the NLRA, significantly complement and define the provisions of the Act. In Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. __ (2014), caregivers who provide home care to participants with disabilities (as part of a state-created program) decided to unionize.

The collective agreement between the union and the state contained a provision on the ”fair share”. . . .